UN: Repeal "Protect Historic Sites"

[Jesioneka]

Description: UN Resolution #15: Protect Historical Sites (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The General Assembly of the United Nations,

COMMENDING Resolution #15: "Protect Historical Sites," for its intent to safeguard historically significant locations within member nations;

HOWEVER NOTING that Resolution #15 wholly lacks any apparent methods for which to protect the historical sites referenced to within the resolution text, only saying "we cannot let historical sites go to waste;"

FURTHER NOTING that Resolution #15, at no point within the resolution text, defines what constitutes a "historical site" that is worthy of protection, thus leading to confusion and misunderstandings among member nations;

CONCLUDING that Resolution #15 is an insufficient and ineffectual resolution, given that it lacks any form of implementation of its admirable intent;

REPEALS Resolution #15: "Protect Historical Sites."

[Petalumadom]

It seems somebody didn't have anything to do when tehy wrote up this one. It is repealing something that was not harmful in the least... but it does have a point but seeing that votes for are pretty far ahead of votes against it would seem unimportant to vote on this repeal...

well that was my two cents...

Votes For: 4,279

Votes Against: 1,585 (at 6:12)

what I basically said was delegate's wishes or abstain...

[The States of Eridani]

This is stupid... So you leave the "historic sites" to waste b/c you can't figure out on your own how to preserve them...

[Petalumadom]

All done:

The resolution Repeal "Protect Historical Sites" was passed 8,060 votes to 3,205.