Post by Benevolent Thomas on May 16, 2013 13:35:15 GMT -5
As for Thomas, the main topic is that your strategy is constant, but not with your actions. You want a moment when you openly accused Aerso?
1) We are dealing with 1 or more wolves that were wolves in the last game.
Aerso was a Wolf last game. Not my point, but as you see I can prove what I say usually. Also you pointed out something interesting, as Ater only supported your theory, but he gave the first vote. I don't see why someone who goes so openly into accusing a group doesn't give a point out too, and although you had 2 theories you were fine as one was accepted.
This makes me conclude that you are not trying to find the wolves, but to get the villager attention on a group and see the wolves response to try find them without revealing them; then you will have this game in a bag, able to turn around ratio as you like while playing low.
Also, all this money launching...didn't we said it's illegal to use tacos in WW games after the WW10 incident? regardless, this is the FIRST time i see you so eager to have people on your theories, and that was before and after Boltor was lynched, so it's not on the fear of being lynched yourself.
There we go everybody, the smoking gun. Aerso was one of the 4 wolves last game and I suggested that this game shares at least one wolf with the last game.
First, feel free to vote for me.
Everyone else, if you recall, my other theory was used to defend Aerso when someone voted for him. I also would like to argue that my actions so far have been consistent with my strategy. I said be on the look out for a new and excited player posting a whole lot, but with little substance in their writing. W&S fit the profile and I voted to lynch him. Sure Ater voted first, but I always put my ideas out there so they can be vetted before I decide to take action on them. Many people approved of my theory and then I applied the idea, just as Nox had done slightly prior, in voting for W&S.
As for the taco launching... the second offer of tacos was clearly me being a smartass because of the first taco launching accusation. I'm pretty sure it has become common practice to ask someone to post up a detailed list of votes, and I think incentives have been used as well without controversy. Thankfully HS has removed the necessity for this.
I really think First is throwing sh*t at the wall and hoping something sticks. I will likely be voting to lynch you First unless another theory shows itself to make more sense. Of course I'll wait for the others to read and form/state their own opinions before I cast my vote. And don't spin it as me trying to wait for a bandwagon before voting, because I can accuse you of doing the same.