Post by HumanSanity on Nov 6, 2020 14:33:09 GMT -5
Protecting Sites Of Religious Significance
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Civil Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Boston Castle
The General Assembly,
RECOGNIZING that many religious traditions have and maintain sites that are important to the history of their creed and the practice of their creed,
FURTHER RECOGNIZING that certain sites of religious significance have have not been properly maintained and preserved,
NOTICING that while the World Assembly has affirmed the right of citizens of nations to practice the religion of their choosing, it has not affirmed that the places of significance to a religion must be protected as well.
DESIRING that this deficiency in existing legislation be remedied in international law, hereby:
1. Defines a "site of religious significance" to be:
a. The foundational place, or places, of a religion;
b. A focus of worship for a religion;
c. The graves of people associated with or significant to a religion;
d. Places of religious community;
e. A museum, or other site protected by law, with a religious character;
2. Creates the Office for the Protection of Religious Sites, hereafter noted as the OPRS, which shall:
a. Work with faith leaders to identify and designate sites of religious significance to presently practiced religions, especially those which have significant meaning to, or are are focuses of worship of, a presently practiced religion;
b. Work with member nations to develop an effective plan to protect designated sites of religious significance; and
3. Further clarifies that member nations must allow sites as designated by the OPRS to be deemed significant and made compliant with this resolution,
4. Asserts the following actions are in violation of this resolution:
a. Desecrating sites of religious significance and desecration shall be defined as;
i. Causing permanent disrepair or irreparable damage to sites of religious significance;
ii. Destroying artefacts or materials contained at said sites which are of religious importance;
iii. The removal of bodies, relics, or items of significance with the intent to make said sites no longer significant as deemed by the OPRS, unless the removal of the bodies, relics, or items of significance is for restoration or maintenance purposes, and
iv. Altering the religious nature of said spaces as defined by the OPRS in an attempt to make them no longer significant by removing their religious character; though
v. Desecration shall not apply in the event of an imminent threat to health and safety with the present conditions of the site, in the event that said sites were established in a hostile fashion (such as through invasion), or if said sites are being altered with a view towards preservation in perpetuity (such as through conversion into a museum);
b. Abusing one's private property rights in the pursuit of gaining the legal right to protect or maintain a site of religious significance;
c. Showing favoritism to, or selectively working to maintain, sites of one belief over another; and
5. Clarifies that nations may restrict access to religious sites in an event which requires that a nation restrict the freedom of movement throughout the whole nation such as a civil war, conflict which occurs on a nation’s territory, internal instability in the region of a religious site, or if a pandemic is declared by a national health service or disease control center,
6. Further clarifies that nations may not impose these restrictions on access solely on the grounds of religion,
7. Urges member nations to take additional measures to provide for the security of sites of religious significance including appointing third-party controllers of religious sites in the event that this would prove to be more conducive to their continued survival and maintenance than local administration.
This is the discussion thread. To cast your vote, go HERE
