Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2014 23:38:20 GMT -5
You argued for everything Thomas did, except the one time where you argued against it and voted for it, so every time you voted you supported Thomas. On both Day 3 and 4, you said you didn't think W&S was that suspicious, but voted for him anyway. That is extremely suspicious to me. Why vote for someone you think is an innocent, unless you're listening to someone who thinks otherwise? And yeah, I know, Day 4 was a self-defense vote. However, you didn't walk the way you talked. You began Day 5 with a vote for yourself. At that point, no one besides Echo and W&S had voted against you -- in fact, I wonder if W&S's comment about Echo "knowing something we didn't" was meant about himself... But I highly doubt that the ghosts have tried to kill yet. Regardless, your opening move for Day 5 seems pretty guilty. Finally, the reason that I think that you supported Thomas on Day 5 is that your post about the quiet ones convinced me to vote for Aerso, one of the quiet ones. On Day 6, there was no way the vote would go another way. I mentioned during the night that he'd be next, and he almost lost the vote the previous day. After his opponent was an innocent, there was no way he wouldn't die on that Day. If I was a ghost, I would have started the vote, so I could use it as evidence. In fact, when I was a wolf, I nearly won a game and got BT to take me into his confidences by doing exactly that. It seems like a reasonable wolf/ghost strategy to me.
I started with Echo, and I'm not sure what your point is there. That's a vote against BT, and one I showed from the beginning. While I did have the same voting pattern that day as you because I was sticking by my pro-lynch position before my "Echo is the only one we have the slightest reason to lynch" position, I turned back to my old position when I saw there was support for it. You're right, I didn't vote for W&S, which means I didn't vote against my own thoughts, unlike you. I also don't think I said anything during W&S's day, but I know for a fact I didn't know who to vote for, so I didn't vote. I did not want to vote no lynch, because I was standing by my belief that lynches needed to happen, but I felt strongly that W&S was innocent and couldn't vote against him again, after a bandwagon shifted saved me from having his blood on my hands on Day 3. On Day 5, I agreed with Thomas that there must be experienced players on the wolf side, which meant probably Aerso or Thomas. I trust Thomas too much, so I decided to try Aerso first, which I am sorry for. That's the game, however. Finally, I said last phase why I voted for you. BT was going down. There was nothing I could do for or against it, as is shown by the fact that only Thomas, Tierra, and I voted against you, and so I decided I'd go against the other player I thought to be a wolf. In the other WW game I was playing at the time, I had just died and left my suspicions unvoiced, and so there was no way I'd make the same mistake twice. I've been wrong every time this game, but there was no harm in me putting myself out there against you.
Let's go down our bandwagon count:
Day 3: I voted for W&S based on pro-lynch, you voted for him while saying he was innocent. We both switched to Echo when that bandwagon arose.
Day 4: I did not vote for someone I now thought was innocent. You did vote for someone you thought was innocent, with BT
Day 5: I voted with BT. You did not vote against BT or anyone else (besides your uncalled for self-defense self-lynch), and you convinced me to do so.
Day 6: BT was gonna die. You and I both knew that; you threw him under the bus to clean your hands, and I marked you to be prepared. This day really has no bearing.
I'd say we're about even in the bandwagon aspect. Of course, if you consider motivations, and that I went with mine and you went against yours, then you're a bit more suspicious.
Essentially, you've been supporting Thomas without doing it outright, which is exactly what I'd expect you to do as a wolf, and what I'd strive to do as a wolf.
1. I said it before and I'll say it again: I wanted to change up my strategy a bit. Normally I vote for the ones that are outright suspicious right down to the tee, and even suggested going after the quiet ones because the ghosts could do well to be hiding under the radar. So it's suspicious that I'm following what I said I was going to do, and go for the ones that AREN'T being the loudest?
2. Except Tsim as well. People were starting to turn their heads towards me a little with Echo, and I'm sure W&S's death turned even more heads to me since I was already a suspect. I said that if it'd make people happy after W&S's death, I'd vote against myself to try to prove my innocence. I was just doing what I told people that I was going to do. That's somehow wrong now?
3. How was Aerso a "quiet one?" Though he didn't say much, he spoke a bit during each phase and especially the 5th. I was obviously referring more to ones like Markanite, who posted one liners with a vote. If you chose to take Aersoldorf from that statement and voted against him, that's your own fault for assuming that I was referring to him.
4. Sure there was. People could have looked at any of the others a bit closer, and could have even stepped away from Thomas, hoping that it wasn't another Ghostbuster versus Ghostbuster round that was happening. But I chose to hop right onto attacking Thomas right at the very beginning. If I really was a Ghost, let alone on his team, wouldn't have it been more logical for me to wait it out and defend the guy and attack the accuser defending him? Hell, wouldn't it have been more logical just to either not vote and shrug it off as being busy, or doing a bandwagon vote against him near the end? Automatically jumping on attacking him near the beginning seems like a pretty strange move for a Ghost to make against a fellow Ghost. If I was really a ghost, it would have made more sense to turn it to someone else completely.
5. So, let me get this straight: You knew for a fact that no matter what, Thomas was going down. I'm sure you even had a conviction that Thomas was guilty after Aerso's death. Yet...you chose to vote WITH him, against someone else that you're not entirely sure of, leaving the possibility of killing off ANOTHER ghostbuster and letting the GHOST live?
Yeah...that makes no sense and just makes me think that you were trying to keep the Ghost alive.
Vote: Lynch Controlitia.