WA Resolution: Liberate the Security Council

[Hockeynutville]

Liberate The Security Council
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region

Category: Liberation
Nominee (region): The Security Council
Proposed by: FlagUnibotian WASC Mission


Description: We the Peoples of the Security Council,

Perceiving the short history of the Security Council so far, as an unsteady beginning -- one full of uncertainty and hesitancy;

Recalling the World Assembly, and at least one historical institution before that, whose beginnings were equally as unsteady;

Aware of the difference between the Security Council and these successful establishments lies not in their ideals, but their organization;

Determining that a higher degree of self-determination, and freedom is thus necessary for a successful establishment;

Whereas the World Assembly Security Council is disregarded as an international malingerer, a distraction from the imperative directives of the General Assembly;

Distressed to hear of potential authors of Security Council Resolutions who have decided not to pursue issues of international security out of fear, and intimidation from naysayers who have been attached to the Security Council not out of preference, but because of its association with the General Assembly -- which is not unlike the relationship of a child to its older brother;

Concerned that such a fraternal shadow may cast darkness over some pressing issues in our world;

Hereby, in the name of dedication to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, liberates the Security Council.

[Ananke II]

Sure, why not. I think the proposal is amusing and I agree with the discussion behind it, so I voted for.

[Bad Infinitum]

I want to see what happens when it passes. FOR.

[Twobagger]

All of the above.
For.

[Biblical Importance]

I love how all of the commendations, the condemnations, , the liberation proposals, and the repeals of each or the mere threat of repealing them got everyone and there brother to complain about how it was wasting the World Assembly's time. But here is something that TRULY IS A WASTE OF TIME and there is not word one about it. HNV, I would have liked to have seen you put a third option in the voting above..."DO NOT VOTE".

I'm ignoring this one.

[Hockeynutville]

Abstaining is the right of every 10KI Citizen. However, it seems contradictory to vote for an abstain. Therefore, it will only be "yes" and "no" and if you think the current resolution at vote is a waste of time, then don't vote.

[LondonCity]

This sounds quite good, but what exactly does it, you know, do?

[Twobagger]

Nov 12, 2009 11:44:20 GMT -5 LondonCity said:

This sounds quite good, but what exactly does it, you know, do?

In practice, it would bar the delegate in the region "The Security Council" from password-protecting that region.

[LondonCity]

Oh good, it just seemed so vague lol

[Walabamba]

It still is vague

[The Colonial Fleet]

Against. It looks like a sneaky attempt to make game mechanic changes to the WA Security Council, concealed by making a founder protected region unable to have the delegate erect password protection. It never should have been allowed to get to the resolution stage.

[Greek People Nation (GPN)]

yea

[Braxil]

I would say yea because they're a good region but the founder was very bad.

[Braxil]

I mean, what if that happened to us???