SC Resolution: Condemn Mukkanism

[Ananke II]

This is the discussion thread. Please go here to cast your vote.

Condemn Mukkanism
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Mukkanism
Proposed by: Thee Cheshire Cat


Description: The Security Council,

COMMITTING: Itself to diplomatic efforts to end injustice, Internationally -- a commitment which current General Assembly (GA) legislation demands from every member nations.

CONDEMING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism for publicly stating that Government sanctioned agents have brutally and deliberately committed human rights violations against those suspected of being sympathetic to a communist ideal. This has included torture, degrading and inhuman acts of violence.

NOTING: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is hereby in violation of General Assembly Resolution #9, #27, #30, #35; Article 1. C, #37, #38. All of which are Resolution which have been passed to work for mankind's protection from accusations, unlawful prosecution, and simple moral human rights.

AWARE: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is currently only committing such atrocious acts against people of Communist Parties.

DENOUNCING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, genocidal acts towards The Accused peoples of their nations, and 'Prosecuted Communist' in their country

DEEPLY CONCERNED: That if no punishment is delivered, then The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, will not only continue such monstrous acts, The Armed Republic of Mukkanism may take their political executions farther to other groups

HEREBY CONDEMNS: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism

[Ananke II]

I'm inclined to either vote against of abstain on this one. I don't feel I know enough to vote for and don't want to get into a habit of just automatically voting for roleplay resolutions for no reason.

[Echolilia]

Um, what?

[New Augustgrad]

After reviewing the "evidence" I'm not convinced that one little comment of theirs, which could have been stated for a number of reasons, albeit immature ones, is enough to justify condemnation.

[The Theban Legion]

I dont believe it was justified because the country is friendly with socialist nations.

[Anime Daisuki]

If we are to condemn every "dictatorship' type nation in NationStates, there are too many to condemn.

As long as they don't bother others, invade, etc, who cares how they want to manage their nation?

[nomadus]

with all due respect to everyone, i voted for this resolution. i don't think the issue is the fact that it was one comment, but rather the content and maliciousness of the statement (joking or not). if we write it off as immature without taking a stance, then we simply condone the behavior in the future. and what simply happens in one country right now, if not addressed, COULD (i emphasize the word could to clarify it doesn't necessarily mean it will) easily spread in the future to lands outside those borders.

[Walabamba]

I'm voting no on this one but I do like the new ways people are using the SC that aren't Defender - Invader situations.

[Markanite]

I'm voting against this, there must be some vendetta here or something, just doesnt make sense to me

[Cerb]

I'm going to abstain. I don't have any strong feelings one way or the other.

[Echolilia]

"Condemn Mukkanism" was defeated 2,975 votes to 1,513.