SC Resolution: Condemn Odhinnia

[Ananke II]

This is the discussion thread. Please go here to cast your vote.

Condemn Odhinnia
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Odhinnia
Proposed by: SdKfz 186


Description: The Security Council,

UNDERSTANDING that Odhinnia is hostile and belligerent.

BELIEVING if Odhinnia continues it's current course countless persons will be forced to live in unnecessary fear.

BEING Shocked and Appalled at the behavior of Odhinnia on the international scale.

HIGHLIGHTING the horrors and atrocities recorded in the Security Council's dossiers on Odhinnia:

A: Odhinnian Government sanctioned eugenics policies.
B: The use of would be "illegal immigrants" by Odhinnian border patrol as a form of entertainment via means of target practice.
C: Recklessly using nuclear force against small third-world nations, such as Poppli.
D: Using the claim of "Divine Mandate" to unjustly invade and perpetuate war against small and peaceful nations.
E: Participating in slave trade as-well-as the usage of slave labor as a means to fuel its War-Machine; including the slaving of children.
F: Constantly researching new viral biological weapons to threaten it's neighbors into submission.
G: Intentional targeting of civilians in war settings.

REALIZING that Odhinnia is a REAL threat to nations around the world.

HEREBY Condemns Odhinnia

[Ananke II]

I'm not much interested in roleplay C&Cs at the best of times, and I think this one is a bit skimpy. However for now I've decided to vote against SC resolutions coming up for vote, until the moderators get their act together to deal with the rule 4 thing.

So, against this one.

[iswa]

Jun 3, 2010 7:30:30 GMT -5 Ananke II said:

I'm not much interested in roleplay C&Cs at the best of times, and I think this one is a bit skimpy. However for now I've decided to vote against SC resolutions coming up for vote, until the moderators get their act together to deal with the rule 4 thing.

So, against this one.

that is smart and I will say this is total CRAP

[Markanite]

Against because of the rule 4 thing!

[Anime Daisuki]

Both the receipient and the proposer are in on this. Why not?

FOR

[Takaram]

Still siding with 3WB.
AGAINST

[Harperians]

I say that I leave it to the smarter people - Ananke's decision is mine then.

[Walabamba]

I've been leaning with 3WB for a while now. AGAINST

[Guy]

Against as per 3WB.

[Coltonians]

Im new here. What is the rule 4 thing?

[Takaram]

Rule 4 is a recently created rule for the SC which bans out-of-character commendations and condemnations. This is fine for in-character C&Cs, but makes drafting far more difficult on the OOC gameplayers. Third Wall Bloc is a voting bloc which has been organized to shut down any Rule 4 compliant C&Cs, which is basically all of them, because those that are not complaint get shot down by the mods. In other words, it's a player-created boycott of all C&Cs until the mods remove or relax rule 4.

[Takaram]

Apparently, Odhinnia has been deleted for posting around a ban, so I guess this resolution is rather pointless.

[Echolilia]

"Condemn Odhinnia" was defeated 3,528 votes to 1,146.