Post by Unibot on Sept 22, 2010 23:43:23 GMT -5
I'm in a really tight bind right now, Alsted has turn me down on this resolution .. he says he won't be able to support it, so now I know I'm going against at-least a 200 strong stomp (make that 380-ish with the 'new' Gatesville and co.). 'Ethics in Int. Trade' is my attempt to write a proposal that actually really means something to me, to write something that would actually help people. Which means the people I usually ally with, are going to become my opposition -- and my opposition will stay my opposition. That's politics. The Art of Exclusion.
I'd like to know what stance 10ki will make, and if I can 'count' on support or not, and if there are suggestions that I can implement which won't undermine the spirit and purpose of the resolution.
If you don't support the spirit of the resolution, I'm submitting this resolution anyway, I'd prefer to submit a proposal that would help people and have it bomb because of corporate greed than the proposal to not be submitted out of fear of action from corporate greed. While I don't label myself 'good', I do believe that when good people do nothing, bad people succeed.
The General Assembly,
Recognizing that an economic disincentive will discourage extreme risks for national populations,
1. Imposes an ethical and ad valorem tariff on any imported good or resource that features one or several of the following criteria:
Said imported goods or resources were manufactured, recovered or generated by those (excluding non-sentient employees, ex. Automata) who do not have,
1.a) The capacity to complete the workload of their occupation, while continuing to actively pursue an education and/or remain in a dignified state of mental and physical health;
1.b) An entitlement to,
● Clean water, sanitation and/or nutrition;
● Assured security --while at their workplace-- from violence, rape, abuse, poisoning and torture from people related to their workplace;
● Sleep, recovery, leisure and rest;
● Fair and just remuneration for the work they provide, that will ensure them and their dependents a dignified existence, if no social protection exists for them otherwise;
2.a) Declares that the set percentage of an ad valorem tariff on each specific imported good or resource’s market value (relevant to c.1), shall be decided by the International Trade Administration (ITA), with consideration from input by any nation or commercial entity;
2.b) Requires the ITA to also consider the following details of each product and their source when finalizing the set percentage:
The product’s fulfillment of the aforementioned criteria that were stipulated in c.1;
● The source’s current economic strength and development and its reasonable capacity to provide laborers with the rights, entitlements and securities that were stipulated in c.1;
● The competitiveness of the international market, concerning said product;
● The market value and demand for said product;
● Price elasticity of demand, and consumer necessities for said product;
● Any existing past transgressions by the source, regarding attempted circumvention of tariffs;
2.c) Reaffirms that the ITA can rule a zero-percentage of a product's market value as being an acceptable tariff if their considerations (ex. necessity goods) suggest that a robust tariff would be unethical and/or unfair;
3.a) Affirms the freedom of all nations, as well as corporate or commercial entities to request an appeal for any decision made by the ITA;
3.b) Further Affirms the duty of the ITA to consider any legitimate request for an appeal, and in a timely fashion, reevaluate the contested decision;
3.c) Entrusts the ITA with the duty to store all collections from this ethical tariff in the 'WA Humanitarian Fund' for allocation (without running a deficit) to the various social justice and humanitarian programs of the World Assembly;
4. Obligates all member-nations -- within their own borders -- to make a coordinated effort to report to the World Assembly and prevent any distribution and/or sale of goods that have circumvented this ethical tariff, or otherwise were in the process of circumvention.
I'd like to know what stance 10ki will make, and if I can 'count' on support or not, and if there are suggestions that I can implement which won't undermine the spirit and purpose of the resolution.
If you don't support the spirit of the resolution, I'm submitting this resolution anyway, I'd prefer to submit a proposal that would help people and have it bomb because of corporate greed than the proposal to not be submitted out of fear of action from corporate greed. While I don't label myself 'good', I do believe that when good people do nothing, bad people succeed.
Ethics in International Trade
A resolution to develop industry around the world.
Category: Advancement of Industry | Area of Effect: Protective Tariffs | Proposed by: Unibot
A resolution to develop industry around the world.
Category: Advancement of Industry | Area of Effect: Protective Tariffs | Proposed by: Unibot
The General Assembly,
Recognizing that an economic disincentive will discourage extreme risks for national populations,
1. Imposes an ethical and ad valorem tariff on any imported good or resource that features one or several of the following criteria:
Said imported goods or resources were manufactured, recovered or generated by those (excluding non-sentient employees, ex. Automata) who do not have,
1.a) The capacity to complete the workload of their occupation, while continuing to actively pursue an education and/or remain in a dignified state of mental and physical health;
1.b) An entitlement to,
● Clean water, sanitation and/or nutrition;
● Assured security --while at their workplace-- from violence, rape, abuse, poisoning and torture from people related to their workplace;
● Sleep, recovery, leisure and rest;
● Fair and just remuneration for the work they provide, that will ensure them and their dependents a dignified existence, if no social protection exists for them otherwise;
2.a) Declares that the set percentage of an ad valorem tariff on each specific imported good or resource’s market value (relevant to c.1), shall be decided by the International Trade Administration (ITA), with consideration from input by any nation or commercial entity;
2.b) Requires the ITA to also consider the following details of each product and their source when finalizing the set percentage:
The product’s fulfillment of the aforementioned criteria that were stipulated in c.1;
● The source’s current economic strength and development and its reasonable capacity to provide laborers with the rights, entitlements and securities that were stipulated in c.1;
● The competitiveness of the international market, concerning said product;
● The market value and demand for said product;
● Price elasticity of demand, and consumer necessities for said product;
● Any existing past transgressions by the source, regarding attempted circumvention of tariffs;
2.c) Reaffirms that the ITA can rule a zero-percentage of a product's market value as being an acceptable tariff if their considerations (ex. necessity goods) suggest that a robust tariff would be unethical and/or unfair;
3.a) Affirms the freedom of all nations, as well as corporate or commercial entities to request an appeal for any decision made by the ITA;
3.b) Further Affirms the duty of the ITA to consider any legitimate request for an appeal, and in a timely fashion, reevaluate the contested decision;
3.c) Entrusts the ITA with the duty to store all collections from this ethical tariff in the 'WA Humanitarian Fund' for allocation (without running a deficit) to the various social justice and humanitarian programs of the World Assembly;
4. Obligates all member-nations -- within their own borders -- to make a coordinated effort to report to the World Assembly and prevent any distribution and/or sale of goods that have circumvented this ethical tariff, or otherwise were in the process of circumvention.
