In summing up

[Tanzoria]

it's the constitution, it's Mabo,it's justice, it's law, it's the vibe and...no that's it it's the vibe. I rest my case

[Ater Nox]

By order of Her Imperial Majesty I hereby find in Tanzotia's favour.

[Tanzoria]

That was sensational Denis

[Ater Nox]

You know it.

[Tanzoria]

this is a blatant violation of the Constitution of Australia, and when it comes to violations, they don't get any bigger

[Ater Nox]

It could have been bigger

[Tanzoria]

Feb 19, 2017 6:43:47 GMT -5 Tanzoria said:

this is a blatant violation of the Constitution of Australia, and when it comes to violations, they don't get any bigger

Learn to read

[Ater Nox]

You failed to consider a scenario in which the Constitution was amended to be longer, and the additional amendments where also violated.

[Tanzoria]

The number of amendments violated is not the sole determining factor in how big the violation was. It's the degree to which the clauses were violated. Here the violation was so egregious that it can be safely called the biggest ever

[Ater Nox]

I disagree, a violation of a large magnitude to a single clause is by definition smaller than an equally large violation simultaneously occuring to a number of clauses.

[Tanzoria]

but it is impossible to equally violate any more than 3 clauses. When multiple clauses are violated at the same time the violations are usually small

[Ater Nox]

I agree that such a situation would be unlikely, but it would still be theoretically possible.

[Tanzoria]

It is theoretically possible, but it's never happened and is never likely to happen. Therefore, for practical purposes violations don't come any bigger than this one

[Ater Nox]

Let's agree that the violation seen today is the biggest likely to be seen in modern times, but well less than the theoretical maximum.

[Tanzoria]

it is slightly smaller

[Ater Nox]

Moderately smaller.

[Tanzoria]

In summing up, it's the Constitution, it's Mabo, it's justice, it's law, it's the vibe, and... no that's it it's the vibe.