[At Vote] [sc]: Liberate Monarchist Bloc

[Lenlyvit]

Security Council Resolution

Liberate Monarchist Bloc

A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region.

Category: Liberation

Nominee(region): Monarchist Bloc

Proposed By:

The Security Council,

Recalling the continued occupation and forced conversion of the Monarchist Bloc to a governorship by The Communist Bloc,

Acknowledging that an injunction resolution alone may not be sufficient to secure the liberty and autonomy of the Monarchist Bloc,

Noting with concern that the Monarchist Bloc remains password protected, effectively preventing former residents from accessing their native region,

Recognizing that it is the inherent right of residents to freely inhabit and participate in the governance of their native region without undue restriction,

Understanding that through the process of liberation, the ailments and challenges faced by the Monarchist Bloc may be addressed and relieved,

Reaffirming the principles of self-determination, sovereignty, and the right to freely determine political status, as enshrined in the inherent rights of free nations and peoples,

Urges The Communist Bloc and all relevant parties to engage in sincere and constructive dialogue with the lawful residents of the Monarchist Bloc to address their concerns, restore their rights, and ensure their meaningful participation in the region's governance,

Calls upon The Communist Bloc to immediately remove the password protection and all other undue restrictions that hinder the residents' rightful return to the Monarchist Bloc.

The Security Council, Hereby enacts the following resolution for the Liberation of the Monarchist Bloc.

This is the discussion thread. To cast your vote, go HERE

[Astrobolt]

Yeah no thanks.

[Pantso]

If it's possible, I would appreciate some additional background on this conflict from someone with more foreign affairs experience. It appears to be a clean-cut case of unwarranted aggression by a known raider region, but posts here and in the RMB imply there may be good reasons not to aid MB. It's hard to vote without understanding that context.

Thanks in advance.

[Lenlyvit]

Jul 7, 2023 17:08:43 GMT -5 Pantso said:

If it's possible, I would appreciate some additional background on this conflict from someone with more foreign affairs experience. It appears to be a clean-cut case of unwarranted aggression by a known raider region, but posts here and in the RMB imply there may be good reasons not to aid MB. It's hard to vote without understanding that context.

Thanks in advance.

The target region in question associated with Fascists and far-right entities in NS.

[Astrobolt]

Jul 7, 2023 19:05:17 GMT -5 Lenlyvit said:

Jul 7, 2023 17:08:43 GMT -5 Pantso said:

If it's possible, I would appreciate some additional background on this conflict from someone with more foreign affairs experience. It appears to be a clean-cut case of unwarranted aggression by a known raider region, but posts here and in the RMB imply there may be good reasons not to aid MB. It's hard to vote without understanding that context.

Thanks in advance.

The target region in question associated with Fascists and far-right entities in NS.

In addition to the target region’s delegate basically agreeing with anti LGBTQ+ takes.

[Pantso]

Thank you. It feels a little skeevy to side with TCB but I'll grant the action was probably justified. I'll recommend Against as well. Perhaps it's more a vote in favor of letting the region die rather than in support of the raiders that killed it.

[spratlyislands]

Considering what has been going on in the 10000 Islands rmb, I vote against

[Jabberwocky]

Against. Nuff said.

[Clialaad]

Tough one.  My first instinct was to recommend "for", but having given it more thought I have no choice but to favour "against".

[icethousand]

Obviously opposed. Not that this would do anything even if it passed, given that there is an active Governor, and a set of raider Successors thereto, and Liberations do nothing in regions with governors.