[At Vote] [sc] Repeal: “Liberate Yessssss”

[Astrobolt]

Security Council Resolution

Repeal: “Liberate Yessssss”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: SC#463

Proposed By: The Hinterplace

Security Council Resolution #463 “Liberate yessssss” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.



The Security Council,



Knowing that the region Yessssss was refounded on 15 August 2023 by nefarious forces, despite the great efforts of Defenders and natives to restore the legitimate government.



Determining that once the region was refounded it ceased to exist, another region was erected with the same name, and despite the similarity is not the same region.



Commiserating the displaced natives of the former region who were forced to find a new home.



Noting that the target resolution, while well-written and composed with benevolent intentions, targets a region that no longer exists and is, therefore, redundant.



Believing that the target resolution should no longer have the force of law, as it targets a region merely because of a similar name.



Hereby Repeals SC#463: Liberate Yessssss.




This is the discussion thread. To cast your vote, go HERE

[Jabberwocky]

This region has indeed been taken over by Ijaka. Tell me what will be accomplished by repealing the resolution.

[icethousand]

Given that this has native support, for.

[Pantso]

It's a little strange that a region that CTEd and was re-founded would retain its liberation and injunction status.

[Jabberwocky]

Oct 13, 2023 18:56:17 GMT -5 Pantso said:

It's a little strange that a region that CTEd and was re-founded would retain its liberation and injunction status.

Right. That's why I wonder what it will accomplish. Are the raiders thumbing their noses at the SC? Sleight of hand?
Plus, we're at war with the current occupants.

[Astrobolt]

Oct 13, 2023 20:39:54 GMT -5 Jabberwocky said:

Oct 13, 2023 18:56:17 GMT -5 Pantso said:

It's a little strange that a region that CTEd and was re-founded would retain its liberation and injunction status.

Right. That's why I wonder what it will accomplish. Are the raiders thumbing their noses at the SC? Sleight of hand?
Plus, we're at war with the current occupants.

The region was refounded by raiders and there is no way for natives to regain control. Nevertheless natives have given their consent for the repeal which is why I support this resolution.

[Jabberwocky]

If the region CTEd, it begs the question: do they have any interest in reviving their region?

Astrobolt, if you don't mind my asking, how do you know the natives give their consent?

[Lenlyvit]

Oct 13, 2023 18:56:17 GMT -5 Pantso said:

It's a little strange that a region that CTEd and was re-founded would retain its liberation and injunction status.

This kind of thing happens all the time, believe it or not. The only thing that would keep it there is if the natives want to keep it there for the future, which they sometimes do. Otherwise, the resolution would be repealed.

[Astrobolt]

Oct 13, 2023 22:44:13 GMT -5 Jabberwocky said:

If the region CTEd, it begs the question: do they have any interest in reviving their region?

Astrobolt , if you don't mind my asking, how do you know the natives give their consent?

One native took the forums to say so Here

[Jabberwocky]

Oh, you mean icethousand? I didn't know if they spoke for the current "natives" who refounded the region  or the original natives who let the region CTE. 

[Vivolkha]

This resolution is very strange in its argumentation. Definitely raises an eyebrow. Would usually vote Against, but I'd say tentatively For because of the apparent native support.

[Astrobolt]

Oct 14, 2023 23:21:18 GMT -5 Jabberwocky said:

Oh, you mean icethousand? I didn't know if they spoke for the current "natives" who refounded the region  or the original natives who let the region CTE. 

Sorry, I did it poorly, but the "Here" in my post links to the onsite thread where a native voiced support. forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=40914240#p40914240
 
Will also say, icethousand is definitely no fan of raiders. icethousand/The Ice States/Magecastle has served and even led defender militaries (the FNDA, the Free Nations Region's military). Currently, they are involved as TNP's WA minister, and regularly participate in big liberations. 

[Jabberwocky]

Oct 15, 2023 21:51:46 GMT -5 Astrobolt said:

Oct 14, 2023 23:21:18 GMT -5 Jabberwocky said:

Oh, you mean icethousand? I didn't know if they spoke for the current "natives" who refounded the region  or the original natives who let the region CTE. 

Sorry, I did it poorly, but the "Here" in my post links to the onsite thread where a native voiced support. forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=40914240#p40914240
 
Will also say, icethousand is definitely no fan of raiders. icethousand/The Ice States/Magecastle has served and even led defender militaries (the FNDA, the Free Nations Region's military). Currently, they are involved as TNP's WA minister, and regularly participate in big liberations. 

Thanks, that's what I was looking for. I don't know how you know that stuff, but that's why you are Delegate and I merely an aspirant.